About Me

Name: Chris
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Vive Le France!

"When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom."
      - Charles Krauthammer, 10/2/2009
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Heard It Here First

It's not likely enough to merit being called a prediction, so I'll just call it a genuine possibility: I believe that so many of President Obama's policies are so wrong-headed, so naive, such train wrecks waiting to happen (in some cases, they've already happened) that they carry the potential of forcing his resignation before all is said and done. He is courting disasters on a grand scale. Political disaster beckons.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Missile Threat

Food for thought, via missilethreat.com (Brian Kennedy of the Claremont Institute is the chief there, and he's a good guy):
 
“The end of the Cold War has made such a strategy [MAD] largely irrelevant. Barely plausible when there was only one strategic opponent, the theory makes no sense in a multipolar world of proliferating nuclear powers. Mutual destruction is not likely to work against religious fanatics; desperate leaders may blackmail with nuclear weapons; blackmail or accidents could run out of control. And when these dangers materialize, the refusal to have made timely provisions will shake confidence in all institutions of government. At a minimum, the rudiments of a defense system capable of rapid expansion should be put into place.”
- Henry Kissinger, March 9, 1995.
Given the dismay in Europe at Obama's decision announced today to back off of anti-missile systems in Poland and the Czech Republic, I'll be interested to hear what Brian Kennedy and others at missilethreat.com have to say in the coming days.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Everybody is a Racist

In "The Incredibles", Mr. Incredible's son, Dash, is frustrated because he isn't allowed to manifest his special super-speed powers. His mother resignedly tells him that everyone's special. "Which is another way of saying that no one is", Dash grumbles in reply.
 
The same operation is happening to the word "racist". Racism is, of course, a bad thing.  It can be so awful in its associations that it used to be that politicians could be cowed by charges of racism whether they were true, not true, or even absurd. But lately, voices on the left have leveled the charge so often, at so many people, for criticizing anything that the left supports- not just people, but policies, ideas, legislative proposals, and so on - that the charge has lost its sting. It has reached the point that anyone who didn't vote for Obama or who dares to peaceably assemble in opposition to the policies of his party is either implicitly or explicitly called a racist.
 
This actually happened to my wife and me at a dinner party.  A friend of ours expressed the opinion that there was no reason to vote against Obama except for racism. Since we couldn't care less what color he was, I was flabbergasted. I don't think the person even realized she had implicitly labelled us as racists. Race had nothing to do with it. But my dinner party experience has been replayed millions of times over lately, both in public and in private. Now, with most people, if polls can be believed, opposing Obama's policies, the opinion makers on the left have taken up the meme that the race card must be played again, and again, and again.
 
I don't know how much of this decision by the left reflects a disconnection from reality or a cynical calculation that the strategy worked well for them in the past, so it should work this time as well. But when most of the country, for reasons having nothing to do with race, dislikes specific policies and is called racist for daring to say so, it doesn't sit well. And when those people are called racists no matter what they do, it begins not to matter to them. And when they see that most of their fellow citizens are labelled the same way, it matters even less. In other words, when everybody is a racist, nobody is - at least in the sense that the epithet loses its sting and the word loses much of its descriptive power.
 
The hard left is destroying a useful word. Honest minded people can rejoice that to some extent that they have already freed us from the power of its false application. The danger, of course, is that when a situation really calls for the word, it may have lost its power there as well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chris liveblogging the President's speech to Congress (Right now!)

Go to my blog (The Dreadnoght) to follow the comments live. Because hey, it might not stink. Maybe.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

But Would You Trust Your Children With Him?

Bummer for Obama. He just wants to talk to kids about doing well in school. But you know, when you get elected to the position of leader of the free world, and then appoint communists as advisors, people no longer trust you to talk to their children when they're not in the room.
 
Van Jones, of course, is only the latest radical to surface, but he may be the straw that broke the camel's back when it comes to Obama's credibility in maintaining that he can associate with radicals but not sympathise with their aims. Having written that he was a communist and signed on to a 9/11 "Truther" statement, as well as having said that the green economy movement he advocates must have a "radical kernel" that can be used for incremental moves that will eventually produce revolution, he must be thinking along the lines of Cardinal Reichelieu in "The Three Musketeers" when he finds out D'artagnan has a letter of carte blanche signed by his own hand: "One must be careful what one writes."
 
Yes, trust is gone. Trust was squandered early on, and it seems to me that trust is exactly the thing Obama needs if he wants to pass healthcare reform with a public option without paying a steep price politically. But he may very well elect to pay the price. I don't know what tack the president will take in his upcoming speech, but I suspect that getting elected to two terms was never Obama's main concern. His main concern was to move the country left, if not by convincing the public his ideas were right, then by making structural changes in the public's relationship with government that would be difficult to reverse once dependence was achieved.
 
"Fundamental transformation" indeed. But at last, people are awake. This should be interesting.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

News Conference

"Then it came burning hot into my mind, whatever he said, and however he flattered, when he got me home to his House, he would sell me for a slave." - John Bunyan, Pilgrim's Progress

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If This is the Way He Handles the Economy...

What's happening with national security?
 
Maybe you should call your Democratic senators or representative and tell them to hit the brakes on all this craziness.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Monroe Doctrine: Will Obama Enforce It?

The bullies of the world smell what they percieve as weakness. Will Obama prove them wrong? Russia has indeed pressed the "reset" button - but they have done it by testing whether Obama and the Democrats have the spine to stand up to them as they do a lower-key replay of the Cuban Missile Crisis. If Obama doesn't stand up to Putin immediately (and see one of my early posts to guage for yourself whether he will, based on his behavior during the Russian invasion of Georgia) it's time to start shouting from the rooftops that this administration must do so.  Again I say, it was silly to elect this man. He invites aggression and testing by his naive and absurd view of the world and by his inexperience. I hope he does well with this crisis for our country's sake, but I doubt McCain would have been put in this position to begin with.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Lowering Tide

According to this opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, President Obama has written a new book saying that it's better for everyone to be worse off together than for some people to do well. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123681860305802821.html ) I realize there is a danger in a super-wealthy class having undue influence in public affairs, but I don't get the impression that that's their main concern. They just think it's "unfair" that the rich should get richer on a comparative basis, regardless if the rest of us get marginally richer in absolute terms. I recall two instances during the campaign that caught my attention with this sort of childish thinking.  In one case, Obama basically iterated the same idea, that he was more concerned with "fairness" than whether everybody as a whole was better off.  In the other, Mr. Obama said he would not support the surge even if he had had the benefit of hindsight knowledge that it worked.  They used to call this "class warfare" and "the politics of resentment".  Ask yourself: is failure better than success as long as we don't admit that something Bush did worked? Is everyone in a state of equal misery preferable to everyone being better off with some becoming better off than others?  I sometimes wonder if we're being led by quasi-Marxists* (or maybe "Marxists-lite") who operate under at least two false assumptions: 1) that the creation of wealth is a zero-sum game; and 2) that it is better to be first among equals in Hell than to allow oneself to occupy a relatively lower spot in a more pleasant locale.
 
* P.S. - If this seems over the top, consider: after his actions over the past few weeks, is there really any doubt about his socialist leanings? Just as a reminder, he launched his political career in the home of a Marxist (who also bombed the pentagon) and wrote in one of his biographies about his communist organizer "mentor" in Hawaii, and how he hung out with the communist activists in college in California, prior to becoming a "community organizer" himself using the methods of radical activist Saul Alinsky. Is he a Marxist? I won't say that, for now. But he's far too close to being one for my comfort, and he does not have an adequate appreciation of what it means to be free. That much is certain.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Regarding Obama

Six weeks into his presidency, sadly, I fear I am justified in saying I was correct.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shakespeare and a Sharp Turn Left Away From Freedom

 

Barack Obama was elected less than one week ago. Here are the Drudge Report headlines from just one day (today) indicating that many leaders, not just in the U.S., but around the world, considers his election to be the go-ahead for big moves toward “supra-national” authority, diminution of personal autonomy, erosion of the nation-state, and a cult of personality highly reminiscent of the Stalinist era or of certain Roman emperors.

Spokesman: 'Obama Ready to RULE on Day 1'...

 

PAPER: Plans for National Holiday Honoring Obama...

 

UK PM: TIME TO BUILD GLOBAL SOCIETY...

...SEEKS 'GLOBAL CONSENSUS' ON TAX, SPENDING POLICIES...

Britain's security agencies seek to censor media...

 

Gorbachev calls on Obama to carry out 'perestroika' in USA...

 GORE: USA needs 'emergency rescue of human civilization'...

Not to sound melodramatic, but take note: your freedom is threatened. Caesar is about to take the throne, where it may be that

… he doth bestride the narrow world
Like a Colossus; and we petty men
Walk under his huge legs, and peep about
To find ourselves dishonourable graves.

-William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Act 1, Scene 2

I certainly don’t suggest that Obama should share Caesar’s fate. Only that he may share Caesar’s ambition, which doesn’t bode well for those of us who want to remain free members of a republic. We need to head him off at the pass by attempting to reason with our fellow citizens.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rewarding the Culprits

If you voted for Obama and the Democrats because you blamed the Republicans for not regulating the financial markets, man, did you blame the wrong people.  In fact you rewarded the culprits.  Here's the proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPSDnGMzIdo
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Word About Young Voters

I hear a fair amount of talk about how young people are different than previous generations, how they process information diferently, how they are more suspicious of hypocrisy.  There's a lot of truth in this, but as one who spends a fair amount of time working with college students, I advise my fellow conservatives to remember this: don't let the sociologists carry you away. Young people are not a different species. The human condition has not been altered, only the external circumstances and the learned modes of communication. Act accordingly. Don't pander to a perceived trend for shallow short-term gains when you need to get in to the real core of the person. There is no substitute for eternal truth expressed from love. And however much the heart is key, we cannot neglect the mind. If they aren't able to think out why they believe the truth, the truth is not likely to stay with them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FYI: Faith-Based Breakdown of the Election

 Just an interesting bit of polling from Associated Press in the post-election analysis. Not the radical shift that was talked about, but enough to be worth looking at.  From what I hear, the youth and the independents made the difference. The independents can shift again, I'm not worried about that so much. But the young voters don't remember the Cold War (a very pertinent gap in knowledge when you elect a socialist who will have to deal with Russian agression), and they are by and large ignorant of history and of what makes America distinctive.  We need a robust educational effort, as well as a renaissance in creative expression of the principles of the American Founding, if we are to remain distinctive - not to mention, actually sticking to those principles and living out the spiritual truth behind them.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »