About Me

Name: Chris
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

"Lipstick on a Pig": Sarah, Please Don't Ask for an Apology

With great respect to Townhall authors and my fellow conservatives:

An article on the main blog page a few hours ago said that Obama was "...defending his slam at Sarah Palin as a pig by denying that's what he meant, though everyone in his audience and across the country instantly knew that is exactly what he meant." 

Actually, there are some notable exceptions, including Dennis Prager, Bill O'Reilly, John Kasich, and Dennis Miller, who have all gone on record saying they don't believe that's what he meant. Further, Ramesh Ponnuru and Kathryn Jean Lopez over at National Review are blogging on The Corner about how the McCain camp is messing up the response. Here's Ponnuru:

"... there may have been good ways to take shots at Obama over the "lipstick on a pig" comment. But the Republicans are coming across as whiny grievance-mongers. Don't they realize that this harping on ambiguous slights is what people hate about political correctness? It was bad enough when liberals were trying to destroy Palin. Now Republicans are trashing her brand. They're undermining the basis of her appeal as a different, tougher kind of female politician. Today has been worse than wasted."

And here's Lopez:

"I said earlier to a colleague or two that I had this awkward feeling earlier today, the kind of feeling I had when George Allen's campaign started attacking Jim Webb for writings against women in combat. We, of course, agreed with most of what he had written on the issue. For a conservative to start crying sexism was ridiculous. Please don't follow that lead, McCain-Palin 2008. I'm heartened, as I noted in my piece today, that Palin hasn't taken up the sexism whine herself. Based on her past comments, I don't imagine she will. And I'd like to believe she cringed, too, when she watched the "lipstick" ad. "

Dick Morris also thinks Palin ought to just dismiss it with a clever comment and a smile.

So evidently I (along with Hollywood and Stephen) am not alone in thinking this is a not an issue on which we should keep pounding away. The response from the right is sounding too much like the left. Just my two cents.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For the Record, re "Lipstick on a pig"

I'm concerned by this rush to judgement that many of my fellow conservatives are making concerning Obama's "lipstick on a pig" comment. I don't buy this stuff about how he was calling Palin a pig. An unfortunate choice of words? Sure. But this enormous focus of attention on the debatable intentions of Obama in making this remark make us look petty, and may backfire on us. It bears at least some resemblance to the silly fixations and weak arguments that are found on the Daily Kos. In this case, I agree with Barack Obama: enough already. Let's move on to the real issues.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mercy, Wisdom, and/or Sic Semper Tyrannis

Kim Jong Il is reportedly not to be seen at public events in North Korea, and may have suffered a stroke, according to the Wall Street Journal. Normally, I pray for those who are ill when I hear about it.  But is it right to do so, when his continued existence on this mortal coil presumably perpetuates his nuclearized, Mao-inspired, Camp Whack-A-Boy* regime that tyrannizes and terrorizes its own people without even a competent pretense of benevolent intent (to say nothing of its troublesome fiddling with nuclear weapons)?  It’s an exercise in charity and good judgment to figure out if/how to pray for him, but considerably easier than it would have been had I suffered directly at the hands of his goose-stepping lackeys (and yes, they really do goose-step, though over sadly cracked and dilapidated pavement thanks to his ruinous economic policies). If he does expire, I expect the world will not miss him much.

 

*This reference may be a little obscure for most people. Camp Whack-A-Boy was the summer camp attended by the comic book character Renfrew, Jerry Lewis’ nephew in the Jerry Lewis comic series published by DC in the late 1960’s or early 1970’s.  It was run by a sadistic German military officer with an eye patch and a dueling scar, along with his former soldiers. The camp featured alligator-infested moats, barbed wire fences, guards with machine guns, and the like.  Jerry was somehow oblivious to the camp’s less attractive features. Unlike North Korea, the comic was pretty funny at times. By the way, "Sic Semper Tyrannis", the motto of the State of Virginia, is Latin for "Thus ever to tyrants".

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CNN Turns a Blind Eye

I watched "Obama Revealed", CNN's hour-long profile of Obama's life and political career.  Care to guess how much time was spent on William Ayers, Obama's bomb-maker terrorist associate who still refuses to sing the "I'm Very Sorry" song?
 
Zero.
 
There was not one mention of this connection.  "Obama Revealed" or "Obama Suppressed"?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Appeal to My Friends on the Fence

Joe Klein has an article on the Newsweek website taking umbrage at Giuliani's and Palin's "community organizer" shots at Obama, and tries to portray Obama's work as a mission of Christian mercy to the poor of Chicago.  Well, maybe in Obama's mind, it was. We can't judge his heart. But several red flags came to mind as I read Klein's article. ACORN. The Gamaliel project. The radical-sounding, "liberation theology"-preaching Catholic priest, Fleger (not sure of the spelling) who starred in the follow-up scandal at the same pulpit where Jeremiah Wright had featured so prominently in the weeks before. I don't have time to write more just yet, but I'm going to look more closely into this. (These men of the cloth, thank God, may well be my brothers in Christ (I certainly hope so). And concern for the downtrodden is certainly scriptural. But their thinking has gone ker-plooey, concentrating on one aspect of truth to the detriment of the whole, lacking in context. They may well be more charitable than I. But they're also nutty. May God bless them, and keep them far from anywhere that they can do damage.)
 
So far, Obama is connected to the following: Wright, Fleger, Ayers, Dohrn, ACORN, Gamaliel (these last two are far-left organizations; ACORN is quite pushy and has been nailed several times for illegal and/or corrupt activities, and Gamaliel was described in the latest issue of National Review as a "stealth" lefty network that avoids the hippie clothing and PC buzzwords in order to quietly push a leftist agenda.)  Given the company he chooses - people he describes as mentors (Wright) and respected community leaders (Ayers, the bomb-maker terrorist) - can you imagine the types of justices Obama would appoint to the Supreme Court?
 
Run, my friends. Escape. I've been in the company of "community organizers" of the type Obama seems to be.  Great compassion, but with rational faculties clouded by preconcieved ideologies and an inability to see the long-term self-sabotage their agenda would produce on their desired ends. Let them teach us compassion, if that's their gift, but not political philosophy. Am I wrong? Tell me why. I'd like to know.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Press

Some of the press are complaining that the country is in a sad state if they have to watch everything they say about Palin and are afraid to do any investigative reporting. This sounds reasonable on the face of it...until we reflect on the continuing refusal of the MSM to focus significant attention on Obama's ties to radicals and terrorists. So when are we going to see some real questioning of Obama?  I'm not a diehard Bill O'Reilly fan, but I hope he'll press this point in his interview with Obama tonight.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Outta the Park

You saw the speech. You don't need me to tell you about it. I had more fun watching Sarah Palin's two national speeches so far than any televised speech since Reagan called the Soviet Union the Evil Empire.
 
It's one thing when Chris Wallace on Fox News says the Democrats are in trouble (which seemed to make Brit Hume squirm. Maybe he thought it didn't look fair and balanced.) But Tom Brokaw on MSNBC said it, too. Something like, "If the Democrats don't have a plan for how to respond to this, they're in trouble."
 
Hugh Hewitt made a humorous observation: "Until yesterday the collective MSM sneer was that Palin was "Hello Kitty," reeling backwards under the pressure. Now she's Gorgo, smashing up the MSM's cars.  The dismayed punditry is pondering the "meanness" of her attacks and her lack of details on health care refom.  A complete triumph over the Beltway-Manhatan media elites, but they will of course regather in Mordor and try again next week."
 
In case you aren't familiar with the character, this is Gorgo:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Breath of Fresh Air

Time for a breath of fresh air outside of the campaign. It's a beautiful warm day, the lark is on the wing, the snail is on the thorn, God's in His Heaven, and the future is not really dependent on who wins this election. Be thankful for your blessings and have a great day!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Bias...

...you think? The contrast between the puff piece on the top cover and the hit piece on the bottom couldn't be much clearer.
 


 
Got an opinion on this? Wondering whether this paragon of investigative journalism is going to balance its reporting with a cover story on the connections between Obama and William Ayers, the bomb-maker terrorist? Or Rezko, the convicted felon who helped Obama structure the deal he got on his house?
US Magazine
(212) 484-1616
Ask for the Editorial Department.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fred Thompson Scores!

This continues to be the most interesting presidential election I can remember.  Fred Thompson's speech tonight was fabulous.  My favorite part was where he said that McCain and Palin would be able to stand up to "the angry left", particularly because I had just been remarking to my wife how some people on the far left seems to have let their rage untether them from their rational faculties. (Or did they become untethered first? That's an interesting question of cause and effect.) By the way, please don't think I'm engaging in ad hominem attacks. If you've never been shouted down by an angry leftist mob, as I have, for asking a genuine question aimed at finding common ground, you may not know just how unhinged and livid these people can be. The Angry Left - I'm going to remember that line.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reasons to Vote for McCain

On this blog, I've posted numerous items that should give readers who are considering voting for Obama pause, but that's not the same as giving reasons why people should vote for McCain.  Peter Robinson, the speech writer who gave Ronald Reagan the line, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!", writes on this subject in the Wall Street Journal. Here's the link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122031196249888759.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries
Tags: mccain  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Carter's Second Term?

"This year will not be a year of politics as usual. It can be a year of inspiration and hope, and it will be a year of concern, of quiet and sober reassessment of our nation's character and purpose. It has already been a year when voters have confounded the experts. And I guarantee you that it will be the year when we give the government of this country back to the people of this country. There is a new mood in America. We have been shaken by a tragic war abroad and by scandals and broken promises at home. Our people are searching for new voices and new ideas and new leaders."
 
Barack Obama, 2008? No. Jimmy Carter, in 1976. Liberal professor Sean Wilentz of Princeton warns readers of Newsweek that Obama may be headed for the same problems that confronted Carter. Not only that, he implies that Obama may be full of half-baked ideas, empty rhetoric, and naive notions of how politics actually work. Here's the link: http://www.newsweek.com/id/154911/page/1
Tags: Carter   obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Good Laugh

For my friends that read my blog but not the main Townhall blog on a daily basis, here's a snippet from Mark Steyn, the British expatriate humorist, that appeared on TH's main blog:
 
"First, Governor Palin is not merely, as Jay describes her, "all-American", but hyper-American. What other country in the developed world produces beauty queens who hunt caribou and serve up a terrific moose stew? As an immigrant, I'm not saying I came to the United States purely to meet chicks like that, but it was certainly high on my list of priorities. And for the gun-totin' Miss Wasilla then to go on to become Governor while having five kids makes it an even more uniquely American story."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wow! What a Contest!

More on this later, but here's my quick assessment of the two history-making speeches in the last 24 hours. Barack Obama's speech was polished, skillful, well-orchestrated and chorographed in the entirety of the overall experience, obviously moving to many, and clearly striking a chord with much of the country in terms of wanting to get beyond racial and political division. A solid triple. And the decision to make a solid base hit rather than swing for the fences was in some respects probably a smart one. Hopefully I can address this later if time permits.
 
Sarah Palin, the newly announced VP pick for McCain, delivered a home run today. Solid, strong, substantive, patriotic, appealing to women, men, sports moms, disaffected Hillary voters, working couples, family values, on and on. Outside the beltway. Executive experience (short, but more than anybody else on either ticket). Well versed in energy issues. Palin was considered an unlikely choice, and has surprised a lot of people.  Much of the afterglow of media attention Obama might otherwise have gotten will be transferred over to this historic new development. This contest has lately become the most interesting presidential race I can remember.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Running Scared

Mass e-mail sent out by the Obama campaign follows. I think they're nervous. If you've read my post on Ayers and Dohrn, or read Kurtz' article (the link is in the Ayers and Dohrn post) you may agree they have reason to be. But maybe not for the reasons they say.
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Obama Action Wire <info@barackobama.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 27, 2008
Subject: Chicago: CALL TONIGHT to fight the latest smear

[Name] -

In the next few hours, we have a crucial opportunity to fight one of
the most cynical and offensive smears ever launched against Barack.

Tonight, WGN radio is giving right-wing hatchet man Stanley Kurtz a
forum to air his baseless, fear-mongering terrorist smears. He's
currently scheduled to spend a solid two-hour block from 9:00 to 11:00
p.m. pushing lies, distortions, and manipulations about Barack and
University of Illinois professor William Ayers.

Tell WGN that by providing Kurtz with airtime, they are legitimizing
baseless attacks from a smear-merchant and lowering the standards of
political discourse.

Call into the "Extension 720" show with Milt Rosenberg at (312) 591-7200

(Show airs from 9:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. tonight)

Then report back on your call at http://my.barackobama.com/WGNstandards

Kurtz has been using his absurd TV appearances in an awkward and
dishonest attempt to play the terrorism card. His current ploy is to
embellish the relationship between Barack and Ayers.

Just last night on Fox News, Kurtz drastically exaggerated Barack's
connection with Ayers by claiming Ayers had recruited Barack to the
board of the Annenberg Challenge. That is completely false and has
been disproved in numerous press accounts.

It is absolutely unacceptable that WGN would give a slimy character
assassin like Kurtz time for his divisive, destructive ranting on our
public airwaves. At the very least, they should offer sane, honest
rebuttal to every one of Kurtz's lies.

Kurtz is scheduled to appear from 9:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. in the Chicago market.

Calling will only take a minute, and it will make a huge difference if
we nip this smear in the bud. Confront Kurtz tonight before this goes
any further:

http://my.barackobama.com/WGNstandards

Please forward this email to everyone you know who can make a call tonight.

Keep fighting the good fight,

Obama Action Wire
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive